|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
19/07/2021 |
Actualizado : |
19/07/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
Autor : |
VASEN, F.; SIERRA, M.; PARUELO, J.; NEGRO, C.; NOLLA, F.; LAPETINA, J.; SALVAGNO, M. |
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO VASEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.; CARLOS ALFREDO NEGRO CHAVES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO EDUARDO NOLLA LANFRANCONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOAQUIN LAPETINA ACERENZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCELO SALVAGNO SELLERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Evaluation of technical production in agricultural sciences a new certification scheme in Uruguay. [La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrariasun nuevo esquema de certificación en Uruguay.]. [Avaliação da produção técnica nas ciências agrícolas um novo esquema de certificação no Uruguai.] |
Complemento del título : |
Section: Social Sciences, Rural Sociology and Agrarian Economy. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, 2021, vol. 25, n.2, article e491. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.491 |
ISSN : |
e-ISSN: 2730-5066 |
DOI : |
10.31285/AGRO.25.491 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 October 2020; Accepted 01 June 2021; Published 12 July 2021.
Editor: Marta Chiappe Hernández, Universidad de la República Montevideo, Uruguay.
Correspondence: Federico Vasen, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: fvasen@rec.uba.ar |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrarias presenta dificultades específicas. A diferencia de las publicaciones científicas, para las que se cuenta con criterios de evaluación estandarizados, los desarrollos tecnológicos requieren una visión más multidimensional y situada. En el presente artículo, analizamos la experiencia de certificación de tecnologías desarrollada por el Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) de Uruguay. El proceso apunta a validar los desarrollos sobre la base de la perspectiva de potenciales usuarios. Con base en una revisión bibliográfica y entrevistas con los participantes, revisamos el diseño del
proceso y la primera ronda de implementación desarrollada en 2019. A partir de los resultados del trabajo, damos cuenta del carácter innovador del proceso, tanto a nivel nacional como regional. A su vez, señalamos la importancia de incorporar variedad de perfiles dentro de los miembros externos, y de privilegiar las instancias
de retroalimentación y aprendizaje por sobre las de control. Finalmente, destacamos la importancia de generar interfases entre este proceso e instancias análogas en otras instituciones.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMO - A avaliação da produção tecnológica nas ciências agrícolas apresenta desafios específicos. Ao contrário das publicações científicas, para as quais existem critérios de avaliação padronizados, os desenvolvimentos tecnológicos exigem uma abordagem mais multidimensional e situada. Neste artigo, analisamos um esquema de certificação tecnológica desenvolvido pelo Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Agropecuária (INIA) do Uruguai. O processo visa validar os desenvolvimentos com base na perspectiva dos usuários potenciais. Com base em uma revisão bibliográfica e entrevistas com os participantes, revisamos o desenho do processo e a primeira
rodada de implementação empreendida em 2019. Com base nos resultados do trabalho, relatamos a natureza inovadora do processo, tanto em nível nacional como regional. Ao mesmo tempo, destacamos a importância de incorporar uma variedade de perfis dentro dos membros externos, e de priorizar o feedback e o aprendizado
sobre o controle burocrático. Finalmente, enfatizamos a importância de ligar este processo com instâncias análogas que possam existir em outras instituições dentro do sistema científico local. MenosABSTRACT - The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrarias presenta dificultades específicas. A diferencia de las publicaciones científicas, para las que se cuenta con criterios de evaluación estandarizados, los desarrollos tecnológicos requieren una visión más multidimensional y situada. En el presente artículo, analizamos la experiencia de certificación de tecnologías desarrol... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Agricultural research; Avaliação; Certificação; Certification; Evaluación; Evaluation; Investigación agropecuaria; Pesquisa agropecuária. |
Thesagro : |
CERTIFICACION. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15869/1/Vasen-F-et-al-2021-AgrocienciaUruguay-e491.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 05030naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1062315 005 2021-07-19 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $ae-ISSN: 2730-5066 024 7 $a10.31285/AGRO.25.491$2DOI 100 1 $aVASEN, F. 245 $aEvaluation of technical production in agricultural sciences a new certification scheme in Uruguay. [La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrariasun nuevo esquema de certificación en Uruguay.]. [Avaliação da produção técnica nas ciências agrícolas um novo esquema de certificação no Uruguai.]$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 30 October 2020; Accepted 01 June 2021; Published 12 July 2021. Editor: Marta Chiappe Hernández, Universidad de la República Montevideo, Uruguay. Correspondence: Federico Vasen, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: fvasen@rec.uba.ar 520 $aABSTRACT - The evaluation of technological production in agricultural sciences presents specific challenges. Unlike scientific publications, for which there are standardized evaluation criteria, technological developments require a more multidimensional and situated approach. This article analyzes a technology certification scheme developed by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA by its Spanish acronym) in Uruguay. The process aims to validate the developments based on the perspective of potential users. Based on a literature review and interviews with participants, we reviewed the process design and the first implementation round in 2019. Given the study results, we reported on the innovative nature of the process, both at national and regional levels. At the same time, we highlight the importance of incorporating a variety of stakeholders and prioritizing feedback and learning over bureaucratic control. Finally, we recommend linking this process with analogous instances that may exist in other institutions within the local science system. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN - La evaluación de la producción tecnológica en ciencias agrarias presenta dificultades específicas. A diferencia de las publicaciones científicas, para las que se cuenta con criterios de evaluación estandarizados, los desarrollos tecnológicos requieren una visión más multidimensional y situada. En el presente artículo, analizamos la experiencia de certificación de tecnologías desarrollada por el Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) de Uruguay. El proceso apunta a validar los desarrollos sobre la base de la perspectiva de potenciales usuarios. Con base en una revisión bibliográfica y entrevistas con los participantes, revisamos el diseño del proceso y la primera ronda de implementación desarrollada en 2019. A partir de los resultados del trabajo, damos cuenta del carácter innovador del proceso, tanto a nivel nacional como regional. A su vez, señalamos la importancia de incorporar variedad de perfiles dentro de los miembros externos, y de privilegiar las instancias de retroalimentación y aprendizaje por sobre las de control. Finalmente, destacamos la importancia de generar interfases entre este proceso e instancias análogas en otras instituciones. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMO - A avaliação da produção tecnológica nas ciências agrícolas apresenta desafios específicos. Ao contrário das publicações científicas, para as quais existem critérios de avaliação padronizados, os desenvolvimentos tecnológicos exigem uma abordagem mais multidimensional e situada. Neste artigo, analisamos um esquema de certificação tecnológica desenvolvido pelo Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Agropecuária (INIA) do Uruguai. O processo visa validar os desenvolvimentos com base na perspectiva dos usuários potenciais. Com base em uma revisão bibliográfica e entrevistas com os participantes, revisamos o desenho do processo e a primeira rodada de implementação empreendida em 2019. Com base nos resultados do trabalho, relatamos a natureza inovadora do processo, tanto em nível nacional como regional. Ao mesmo tempo, destacamos a importância de incorporar uma variedade de perfis dentro dos membros externos, e de priorizar o feedback e o aprendizado sobre o controle burocrático. Finalmente, enfatizamos a importância de ligar este processo com instâncias análogas que possam existir em outras instituições dentro do sistema científico local. 650 $aCERTIFICACION 653 $aAgricultural research 653 $aAvaliação 653 $aCertificação 653 $aCertification 653 $aEvaluación 653 $aEvaluation 653 $aInvestigación agropecuaria 653 $aPesquisa agropecuária 700 1 $aSIERRA, M. 700 1 $aPARUELO, J. 700 1 $aNEGRO, C. 700 1 $aNOLLA, F. 700 1 $aLAPETINA, J. 700 1 $aSALVAGNO, M. 773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, 2021, vol. 25$gn.2, article e491. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.491
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
29/02/2024 |
Actualizado : |
29/02/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BROCHADO, C.; DURAN, B.J.; KIEFFER, J.D.; PINCZAK, A.; MENCHACA, A.; GARCIA-GUERRA, A. |
Afiliación : |
C. BROCHADO, Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay; B. J. DURÁN, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; J. D. KIEFFER, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; A. PINCZAK, Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay; JOSE ALEJO MENCHACA BARBEITO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay; A. GARCIA-GUERRA, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States. |
Título : |
Reduced embryo yield obtained from superstimulated ewes with low circulating AMH concentration is improved by lengthening the FSH treatment. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Theriogenology. 2024, Volume 218, Pages 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.024 |
ISSN : |
0093-691X |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.024 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 20 September 2023; Received in revised form 17 January 2024; Accepted 23 January 2024; Available online 25 January 2024; To be published 1 April 2024. -- Correspondence: Garcia-Guerra, A.; Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; email:garciaguerra.1@osu.edu ; Menchaca, A.; Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay; email:menchaca.alejo@gmail.com -- Funding: Research support was provided by 1) state and federal funds appropriated to The Ohio State University, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center and 2) the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Multi-State Hatch project 1023183 (OHO01496-MRF). Camila Brochado received a scholarship from the Sistema Nacional de Becas (ANII, Uruguay). -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- The aim of the present study was to evaluate: 1) the association between AMH, AFC, superovulatory response and embryo yield in sheep; and 2) the effect of FSH treatment length during superstimulation of the first follicular wave on ovarian response and embryo yield, particularly in ewes with low and high AMH. The experiment was performed on 63 Polled Dorset ewes that received an ovarian superstimulatory treatment during the first follicular wave (Day 0 protocol). Ewes were administered a total dose of 240 mg of FSH distributed in six (6-dose regimen, n = 30) or eight (8-dose regimen, n = 33) decreasing doses administered 12 h apart. On Day -9 (random stage of the estrous cycle) and Day 0 (day of the first FSH dose) ovarian ultrasonography was performed and blood samples were collected for AFC and AMH determinations, respectively. A weak positive correlation between AMH and small AFC (follicles <4 mm) was observed (r = 0.23; P = 0.07), and AMH concentration was positively correlated (r = 0.29; P < 0.05) with the number of corpora lutea (CL) determined at embryo collection (i.e., 6 d after insemination). The length of FSH treatment tended (P = 0.06) to affect the ovarian response, such that the number of CL was greater in 8-dose than 6-dose treated ewes, while no differences (P > 0.10) in embryo yield outcomes were observed. For further analysis, ewes were classified into low (<7 ng/mL) and high (>10 ng/mL) serum AMH. In high AMH ewes, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the number of CL nor embryo yield between the 6-dose and 8-dose treatment (e.g., 7.8 ± 2.4 and 8.3 ± 2.5 transferable embryos, respectively; P = 0.92). Conversely, for low AMH ewes, fertilized ova and embryo yield were greater (P <= 0.05) for ewes receiving the 8-dose than the 6-dose superstimulatory treatment (e.g., 8.4 ± 2.8 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 0.9 transferable embryos, respectively, P <= 0.05). In conclusion, embryo production in poor responding ewes with low low circulating AMH is improved by extending the superstimulatory treatment length from 6 to 8 FSH doses. © 2024 Elsevier Inc. MenosABSTRACT.- The aim of the present study was to evaluate: 1) the association between AMH, AFC, superovulatory response and embryo yield in sheep; and 2) the effect of FSH treatment length during superstimulation of the first follicular wave on ovarian response and embryo yield, particularly in ewes with low and high AMH. The experiment was performed on 63 Polled Dorset ewes that received an ovarian superstimulatory treatment during the first follicular wave (Day 0 protocol). Ewes were administered a total dose of 240 mg of FSH distributed in six (6-dose regimen, n = 30) or eight (8-dose regimen, n = 33) decreasing doses administered 12 h apart. On Day -9 (random stage of the estrous cycle) and Day 0 (day of the first FSH dose) ovarian ultrasonography was performed and blood samples were collected for AFC and AMH determinations, respectively. A weak positive correlation between AMH and small AFC (follicles <4 mm) was observed (r = 0.23; P = 0.07), and AMH concentration was positively correlated (r = 0.29; P < 0.05) with the number of corpora lutea (CL) determined at embryo collection (i.e., 6 d after insemination). The length of FSH treatment tended (P = 0.06) to affect the ovarian response, such that the number of CL was greater in 8-dose than 6-dose treated ewes, while no differences (P > 0.10) in embryo yield outcomes were observed. For further analysis, ewes were classified into low (<7 ng/mL) and high (>10 ng/mL) serum AMH. In high AMH ewes, there were no differences (P >... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Anti-Müllerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Follicle stimulating hormone; Ovarian superstimulation; Ovine; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL - INIA. |
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
Marc : |
LEADER 03935naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1064482 005 2024-02-29 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0093-691X 024 7 $a10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.024$2DOI 100 1 $aBROCHADO, C. 245 $aReduced embryo yield obtained from superstimulated ewes with low circulating AMH concentration is improved by lengthening the FSH treatment.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 500 $aArticle history: Received 20 September 2023; Received in revised form 17 January 2024; Accepted 23 January 2024; Available online 25 January 2024; To be published 1 April 2024. -- Correspondence: Garcia-Guerra, A.; Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; email:garciaguerra.1@osu.edu ; Menchaca, A.; Fundación IRAUy, Montevideo, Uruguay; email:menchaca.alejo@gmail.com -- Funding: Research support was provided by 1) state and federal funds appropriated to The Ohio State University, College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center and 2) the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Multi-State Hatch project 1023183 (OHO01496-MRF). Camila Brochado received a scholarship from the Sistema Nacional de Becas (ANII, Uruguay). -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- The aim of the present study was to evaluate: 1) the association between AMH, AFC, superovulatory response and embryo yield in sheep; and 2) the effect of FSH treatment length during superstimulation of the first follicular wave on ovarian response and embryo yield, particularly in ewes with low and high AMH. The experiment was performed on 63 Polled Dorset ewes that received an ovarian superstimulatory treatment during the first follicular wave (Day 0 protocol). Ewes were administered a total dose of 240 mg of FSH distributed in six (6-dose regimen, n = 30) or eight (8-dose regimen, n = 33) decreasing doses administered 12 h apart. On Day -9 (random stage of the estrous cycle) and Day 0 (day of the first FSH dose) ovarian ultrasonography was performed and blood samples were collected for AFC and AMH determinations, respectively. A weak positive correlation between AMH and small AFC (follicles <4 mm) was observed (r = 0.23; P = 0.07), and AMH concentration was positively correlated (r = 0.29; P < 0.05) with the number of corpora lutea (CL) determined at embryo collection (i.e., 6 d after insemination). The length of FSH treatment tended (P = 0.06) to affect the ovarian response, such that the number of CL was greater in 8-dose than 6-dose treated ewes, while no differences (P > 0.10) in embryo yield outcomes were observed. For further analysis, ewes were classified into low (<7 ng/mL) and high (>10 ng/mL) serum AMH. In high AMH ewes, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in the number of CL nor embryo yield between the 6-dose and 8-dose treatment (e.g., 7.8 ± 2.4 and 8.3 ± 2.5 transferable embryos, respectively; P = 0.92). Conversely, for low AMH ewes, fertilized ova and embryo yield were greater (P <= 0.05) for ewes receiving the 8-dose than the 6-dose superstimulatory treatment (e.g., 8.4 ± 2.8 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 0.9 transferable embryos, respectively, P <= 0.05). In conclusion, embryo production in poor responding ewes with low low circulating AMH is improved by extending the superstimulatory treatment length from 6 to 8 FSH doses. © 2024 Elsevier Inc. 653 $aAnti-Müllerian hormone 653 $aAntral follicle count 653 $aFollicle stimulating hormone 653 $aOvarian superstimulation 653 $aOvine 653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL - INIA 700 1 $aDURAN, B.J. 700 1 $aKIEFFER, J.D. 700 1 $aPINCZAK, A. 700 1 $aMENCHACA, A. 700 1 $aGARCIA-GUERRA, A. 773 $tTheriogenology. 2024, Volume 218, Pages 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.01.024
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|